Monday, May 20, 2019

Which the Design Argument Provides Evidence for the God?

June 2011 Examine the government agencys in which the design list provides evidence for the mankind graven image? A famous philosopher Kant commented on the proof of the design argumentation which dooms the existence of deity stating This proof continuously deserves to be mentioned with respect. It is the oldest, the clearest and about accordant with the common reason of mankind. This was mentioned in his book the Critique of Pure reason. The argument that I am going to put forward and the proofs I am going to provide is the teleological argument.The word teleological comes from the Greek word telos which marrow end or purpose and logical which means the study of therefore this is the study of the purpose. The teleological argument is an inductive argument therefore proofs are found on premises which means they are drawn from experience and the conclusion is not logically necessary. doubting Thomas is a very important philosopher in the design argument. In his famous work s umma theological doubting Thomas had his five counselings in which he is most remembered for. In the design argument we are most concerned with the final way which is that God is the divine couturier of everything.Here Aquinas suggests that non precocious material requires an respectable being behind it to make it beneficial. Aquinas used the example of an arrow and a archer he stated that for an arrow to scope its destination it must be directed by the archer which is the intelligent being therefore applying this to the instauration for us to reach are destination and purpose in the universe there must be a higher intelligent being before us which is direct us. Aquinas stated natural bodies seem to act in a regular way to reach some sort of final purpose this shows Aquinas using science to back up the views of God in the Bible.Also Aquinas argued for design qua regularity he see the overall regularity in the earthly concern as proof for a designer God. William Paley anothe r famous philosopher mainly known for his Watch affinity to a faultk Aquinass ideas further and formed his own version of the teleological argument. Paley compares the world to a railroad car and sees it made up of all intricate parts which work together for an end result. He saw all the small adaptations in the personality and for him these were proofs of a designing intelligence.An example of the small intricacies in the nature is the water cycle and how it all works together. The watch serves an analogy which demonstrates purpose and telos. All evidence would show that the watch had been knowing for a purpose, design and designed with the necessary regularity to meet its purpose. He give tongue to every design requires a designer and that all designs study an end function. Paley claimed that in the same way as the watch and other machines the universe was full of small intricacies that could not have come about by chance.Paley used the example of the eye. The way the eye i s so complexly designed there is no way it could have all come about by chance yet science till date is unable to create a replica of the eye. Also Paley was fascinated by the solar system and the rotation of the planets. He saw the evidence of a divine hand at work in the universe. F. R. Tennant a philosopher of the 1930s elaborated on the teleological arguments with his anthropic principle. This principle basically is saying that the world is revolving around human kind.Tennant believed the best evidence of design could be seen in the way the universe supports intelligent life. An example of this would be how the trees release type O which supports us humans to live and without oxygen we wouldnt be alive. This is an astonishing proof of design and existence of God. Also another example of Tennants anthropic principle which shows that the world is designed around us human beings is that the sun is placed in the perfect distance. Tennant developed his anthropic principle to add th e aesthetic argument in this Tennant argued against Darwins opening of evolution.He said that the theory of evolution fecal matternot explain why humans have feelings as they are not necessary for survival also natural selection cannot account for the existence for the feelings of appreciation etc. Tennant believed that the mental object for joy was putt in us by our designer which is God. Richard Swinburne accepts the anthropic principle. Swinburne believes that the earth is so alright tuned that there is no other explanation other than a designer God. He believes that science explains how the things in the world are so finely tuned in the world and that the Bible explains why.Swinburne believe that we should understand the existence of scientific laws in terms of a purpose which has been put in place for the. The purpose can be best explained by an omnipotent being. Due to the design argument being an a posteriori argument it strengthens the argument as we can see the complexi ties with our naked eye. However due to it being inductive marrow based on experiences people interpret the experiences differently moreover it can negatively be argued that the designer or creator does not have to be God and that the jump to conclusion of god is too big

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.